Bibcode
Burningham, Ben; Pinfield, D. J.; Leggett, S. K.; Tinney, C. G.; Liu, M. C.; Homeier, D.; West, A. A.; Day-Jones, A.; Huelamo, N.; Dupuy, T. J.; Zhang, Z.; Murray, D. N.; Lodieu, N.; Barrado Y Navascués, D.; Folkes, S.; Galvez-Ortiz, M. C.; Jones, H. R. A.; Lucas, P. W.; Calderon, M. Morales; Tamura, M.
Bibliographical reference
Monthly Notices of the Royal Astronomical Society, Volume 395, Issue 3, pp. 1237-1248.
Advertised on:
5
2009
Citations
116
Refereed citations
98
Description
We report the discovery of a T8.5 dwarf, which is a companion to the M4
dwarf Wolf 940. At a distance of 12.50+0.75-0.67
pc, the angular separation of 32 arcsec corresponds to a projected
separation of 400 au. The M4 primary displays no Hα emission, and
we apply the age-activity relations of West et al. to place a lower
limit on the age of the system of 3.5 Gyr. Weak Hα absorption
suggests some residual activity, and we estimate an upper age limit of 6
Gyr. We apply the relations of Bonfils et al. for V - Ks and
to determine the metallicity, [Fe/H] = -0.06 +/- 0.20 for Wolf 940A, and
by extension the T8.5 secondary, Wolf 940B. We have obtained JHK NIRI
spectroscopy and JHKL' photometry of Wolf 940B, and use these data, in
combination with theoretical extensions, to determine its bolometric
flux, Fbol = 1.75 +/- 0.18 ×
10-16Wm-2, and thus its luminosity
log(L*/Lsolar) = -6.07 +/- 0.04. Using the age
constraints for the system and evolutionary structural models of Baraffe
et al., we determine Teff = 570 +/- 25K and logg = 4.75 -
5.00 for Wolf 940B, based on its bolometric luminosity. This represents
the first determination of these properties for a T8+ dwarf that does
not rely on the fitting of T dwarf spectral models. This object
represents the first system containing a T8+ dwarf for which fiducial
constraints on its properties are available, and we compare its spectra
with those of the latest very cool BT-Settl models. This clearly
demonstrates that the use of the (WJ, K/J) spectral ratios
(used previously to constrain Teff and logg) would have
overestimated Teff by ~100K.