Bibcode
Poretti, E.; Michel, E.; Garrido, R.; Lefevre, L.; Mantegazza, L.; Rainer, M.; Rodriguez, E.; Uytterhoeven, K.; Amado, J. P.; Martin-Ruiz, S.; Moya, A.; Niemczura, E.; Suarez, J. C.; Zima, W.; Baglin, A.; Auvergne, M.; Baudin, F.; Catala, C.; Samadi, R.; Alvarez, M.; Mathias, P.; Paparo, M.; Papics, P.; Plachy, E.
Bibliographical reference
VizieR On-line Data Catalog: J/A+A/506/85. Originally published in: 2009A&A...506...85P
Advertised on:
6
2009
Citations
0
Refereed citations
0
Description
We compared the results from SigSpec and from the iterative-sine-wave
fitting, considering an error range of 0.005d-1 in frequency
(i.e., a width 3.4 times narrower than 1/DeltaT). The cross-checks show
an almost complete agreement on the values of the first 500 frequencies:
498 frequencies were found by both methods, whose 438 (88%) have an
amplitude within the 20% range of tolerance. In particular, both methods
correctly identified the first 462 frequencies within an interval of few
units of 10-4d-1. These frequencies are listed in
Table 2.
(1 data file).