Bibcode
DOI
Goicoechea, L. J.; Gil-Merino, R.; Ullán, A.; Serra-Ricart, M.; Muñoz, J. A.; Mediavilla, E.; González-Cadelo, J.; Oscoz, A.
Bibliographical reference
The Astrophysical Journal, Volume 619, Issue 1, pp. 19-29.
Advertised on:
1
2005
Journal
Citations
12
Refereed citations
10
Description
We present VR magnification ratios of QSO 0957+561 that are inferred
from the GLITP light curves of Q0957+561A and new frames taken with the
2.56 m Nordic Optical Telescope about 14 months after the GLITP
monitoring. To extract the fluxes of the two close components, two
different photometric techniques are used, pho2comC and psfphot. From
the two photometric approaches and a reasonable range for the time delay
in the system (415-430 days), we do not obtain achromatic optical
continuum ratios, but ratios depending on the wavelength. Our final
global measurements
ΔmAB(λV)=0.077+/-0.023 mag and
ΔmAB(λR)=0.022+/-0.013 mag (1 σ
intervals) are in agreement with the Oslo group results (using the same
telescope in the same seasons but another photometric task and only one
time delay of about 416 days). These new measurements are consistent
with differential extinction in the lens galaxy, the Lyman limit system,
the damped Lyα system, or the host galaxy of the QSO. The possible
values for the differential extinction and the ratio of total to
selective extinction in the V band are reasonable. Moreover, crude
probability arguments suggest that the ray paths of the two components
cross a similar dusty environment, including a network of compact dust
clouds and compact dust voids. As an alternative (in fact, the usual
interpretation of the old ratios), we also try to explain the new ratios
as being caused by gravitational microlensing in the deflector. From
magnification maps for each of the gravitationally lensed images, using
different fractions of the surface mass density represented by the
microlenses as well as different sizes and profiles of the V-band and
R-band sources, several synthetic distributions of
[ΔmAB(λV),
ΔmAB(λR)] pairs are derived. In some
gravitational scenarios, there is an apparent disagreement between the
observed pair of ratios and the simulated distributions. However,
several microlensing pictures work well. To decide between either
extinction, microlensing, or a mixed scenario (extinction +
microlensing), new observational and interpretation efforts are
required.