Bibcode
DOI
Westendorp Plaza, C.; del Toro Iniesta, J. C.; Ruiz-Cobo, B.; Martinez Pillet, V.; Lites, B. W.; Skumanich, A.
Bibliographical reference
Astrophysical Journal v.494, p.453
Advertised on:
2
1998
Citations
72
Refereed citations
65
Description
A quantitative comparison between the Milne-Eddington (ME) inversion
technique implemented by Skumanich & Lites and the SIR (Stokes
Inversion based on Response Functions) proposed by Ruiz Cobo & del
Toro Iniesta is presented. Numerical experiments are carried out to
explore the capabilities and limitations of both diagnostic techniques.
Such experiments consist of inversions of Stokes profiles previously
synthesized in "realistic" solar atmospheric models. The results show
that the ME inversion provides accurate, line-of-sight (LOS) averaged
values for the input stratification of the vector magnetic field. Its
greater speed compared to SIR makes it useful for quick analysis of
large quantities of data (such as those currently provided by modern
spectropolarimeters) if one is only interested in LOS-averaged
quantities. However, the higher order description of the atmosphere used
by SIR (which acknowledges variation of the thermal, dynamic, and
magnetic parameters through the photosphere) allows retrieval of the
stratification of all these parameters to good accuracy. This is so even
in the presence of discontinuities such as those foreseen in magnetic
canopies of sunspots. The trade-offs between thermodynamic and magnetic
parameters observed in some ME inversions are reduced considerably in
the case of SIR inversions because of the more realistic treatment of
the thermodynamics in this analysis. Notably, both allow one to extract
quantitative inferences of fairly weak magnetic fields (below 500 G),
even when they are applied to Zeeman-sensitive lines in the visible
spectrum; i.e., well below the commonly accepted limit of 500 G. The
thermodynamic parameters resulting from the ME inversion are understood
theoretically in terms of the generalized response functions introduced
by Ruiz Cobo & del Toro Iniesta and through the concept of height of
formation for inferred values proposed by Sanchez Almeida, Ruiz Cobo,
& del Toro Iniesta. The present comparison and verification of the
reliability of inversion methods is a natural first step toward the
ongoing analysis of the three-dimensional magnetic structure of a
sunspot. By using SIR (with ME results for initialization) on maps of a
whole sunspot observed by the Advanced Stokes Polarimeter, we obtain
maps at different optical layers (i.e., an optical tomography) of the
temperature, vector magnetic field, and LOS velocity. Such a tomography
will appear in subsequent papers of the present series. To illustrate
fits to the observed Stokes profiles, we show here actual inversion
results for three points observed within a sunspot: one within the
umbra, another from the outermost parts of the penumbra, and a third
from the magnetic canopy surrounding the sunspot.