Bibcode
Kidger, M. R.
Bibliographical reference
Earth, Moon, and Planets, v. 90, Issue 1, p. 259-268 (2002).
Advertised on:
3
2002
Citations
6
Refereed citations
6
Description
Amateur astronomers have always represented an important observing group
in cometary astronomy. Much of our knowledge of cometary light curves
has come from amateur data, initially in the form of total visual
magnitude estimates and now increasingly in the form of CCD
observations. The increasingly widespread use by amateur astronomers of
CCD cameras of excellent sensitivity and good cosmetic quality has
revolutionised astrometry, allowing far more intensive astrometric
monitoring of comets to be carried out down to magnitude 18 and fainter,
with a corresponding enormous increase in the quality of calculated
orbits. Although amateur CCD photometry is extensively available in the
Internet, its use has been less widespread. The reason is the lack of
standardisation in the way that this data is taken that leads to amateur
CCD light curves having enormous dispersion. All amateur CCD photometry
is aperture photometry, but it is seen that neither does it represent
well the equivalent of m1 (total visual magnitude), even with a large
aperture, nor is it close to the definition of m2 (the
nucleus magnitude). The problem is examined using data from the Spanish
Comet Observers Group archives to show that by careful standardisation
of data acquisition amateur CCD data can produce high quality,
well-sampled and physically meaningful light curves. Examples are
presented of the results for recent comets including 19P/Borrelly,
51P/Harrington, C/2001 TU80 (LINEAR-NEAT), C/2000 WM1 (LINEAR) &
C/2001 A2 (LINEAR).